January 22, 2004
-
*grumble*
I took a trip to the dentist last night. Brought my little sister along too–we had a double appointment.
So we get there, and Stefanie goes in first. Having forgotten to bring a book, I began to browse through the various year-old magazines that were scattered throughout the waiting room. I was perhaps halfway though “Why men cheat–everything you wanted to know about your unfaithful man!” or some other such fluff in one of the mindless pop-culture magazines… Then Stef comes out, and it’s my turn.
The dentist aide takes me in, seats me in the chair and is putting the bib on me and such. We’re chatting–she’s a little older than me, rather pretty, well-versed in literature.
Then the dentist comes in.
Darth Vader theme music plays as he strides into the room. The aide gives him a wave hello, but to me it looked almost like the “Heil, mein Fuhrer!” salute. The lights dimmed, and somewhere in the distance dogs began to howl.
The aide scurried away, vanishing into the doorway beyond and leaving me alone with the dentist.
So first he has me open my mouth and is “checking my teeth.” What this means is that he takes a sharp pointy object from his tray of sharp pointy objects and proceeds to scratch at each tooth. Sometimes he misses the tooth entirely and pokes my gum. The whole time he keeps sticking this little mirror thing down my throat–like he’s trying to see what I had for lunch or something. And he keeps the sucky thing in my mouth–to dry up my spit, I assume. It makes my tongue all dry until it feels like cardboard.
“I see that last wisdom tooth finally came in,” the dentist intones. It’s true–three of my teeth came in on time when I was 18, but the fourth was stubborn. It took its sweet time to work its way through the gum, only emerging fully sometime in the last six months.
He then proceeds to scratch the wisdom tooth…and scratch it…and scratch it… I’m having visions of all my enamel being scraped off for some sick dentist experiment involving the cross-breeding of goblin men and Russo Tooth Enamel.
“Oh dear,” the dentist says. “Looks like that wisdom tooth has a cavity.”
“Of course it has a cavity! You just SCRATCHED a cavity in it!” I want to scream.
I restrain my temper, and instead ask, “How is that possible? It just came in!” (Well, he still had his torture implements in my mouth. So it came out, “‘ow i’ ‘at’ ‘ossi’le? I’ ‘us’ ‘a’ in’!”) I’ve never had a cavity in my life, so I’m a little upset about this.
“Well, sometimes when a wisdom tooth takes a long time coming in, it’s easy for bacteria to get trapped down there and cause decay,” the dentist says.
Finally he decides that he’s scraped my gums up enough for one day. He takes out the pointy things and the sucky thing, and gets to the only part about dentist-visits that I enjoy–the mint spinny thing. So he takes the mint spinny thing and buffs my teeth up, squirting mint all over my face and shirt in the process. And then he tells me to spit.
I lean over the bowl and spit. I rinse, swish, spit again. Then I realize that for some reason, my saliva is bright red. Frantically I keep spitting until the blood washes away and it comes out clear again.
Wanting to yell at the dentist for making my gums bleed, I turn, but he’s gone. The pretty aide is back, taking off my bib. “You’ll have to make an appointment to get that cavity filled,” she says to me. And as slide off the chair, she hands me…a toothbrush.
She HANDED me a TOOTHBRUSH!
What exactly was she trying to say? I take VERY good care of my teeth! This is my FIRST CAVITY!
I walked out of that office feeling like a POW that’s been tormented by his captors. My filling appointment is for Tuesday.
*grumble*
Comments (19)
usually the hygenist is the one that tortures me. the dentist just comes in, looks at my teeth, says, “yup, they look good” and leaves. hmmm…
my wisdom teeth are GONE.
i just read that chesterton quote the other day! cool!
i’ma wait to weigh in with my thoughts on the co-ed bible studies…i want to see some other ideas first…
i definately think there can be co-ed studies…atleast if it truly is a “study” group where you are studying a book of the Bible or something. Like, sure you can have a co-ed study to learn more about the book of Matthew… I think however, if the study is more of the type that utilizes the Bible for a study more focused on person issues, or character or something of that nature – having ‘same sex’ studies provides a more comfortable forum to open up and discuss your personal life and/or struggles.
I had my four wisdom teeth broken and dug out from my gums… leaving me swollen, purple and defenseless on the couch for 3 days. How’s that for pain? Haha. Anyways…
I think that it depends on what the topic of the bible study is. If you’re going over the book of Romans for example, co-ed studies are great. It’s interesting how men and women can take completely different angles on the same passage simply because of their unique experiences. I read somewhere that woman tend to memorize scripture pertaining to love and faith where as men tend to memorize scripture depicting God’s ultimate power and wrath. True? I don’t know for sure. Maybe that’s a whole other discussion. If you happen to be studying more personal issues then the studies should probably consist of same sex members.
Here’s another question on the same track… should woman be allowed to lead co-ed studies? I lead a freshman women’s bible study with another girl. But our co-ed study is also lead by two girls. In past years they’ve been lead by pairs of guys as well… I’m not sure about co-ed co’s. lol. What do you think?
sorry about the cavity .. i know what it feels like
i’ve got me some fillings
You are very welcome–I enjoy reading all the debates on your site. Kim introduced me to your site and I’ve enjoyed the postings. Later!
Bloodthirsty dentists! Chris, you are so melodramatic. I love it! I remember when my dentist once said “I’m going to just work on this tiny cavity, you’ll be fine” No novocaine, no anything… 10 minutes of (apparently) punching my nerve root with some sort of metal implement (and ignoring my please for mercy) he says “Wow. I’m sorry. That was actually a lot bigger than I had though”. Yeah, at least I also received a toothbrush. Thanks, man! /// Yes, one had better not mess up the alfredo sauce! Cooking is a nice skill to have… I’m the king of the sautee and steamer (Olivio Olive Oil butter rocks!!!) And you are right, it doesn’t have to necessarily be a dozen roses to be meaningful. I once made someone an arraingement of 11 yellow roses with a red one in the middle and a card which stated “out of friendship can come love most unexpected” or something nice like that. I thought it was pretty cool. until we broke up. I’ll have to remember and use that line later. I just wonder how to propose to someone – assuming God indeed has us in mind to marry one day – I just know i will do something elaborate. Perhaps place a fake ring in a box and kneel down on a bridge someone, then “accidentally” drop the whole thing into the water, feign surprise and then present a real one! Wait, what if she jumps in after it… I am going dangerous places in this reply. Later!
Chris, if I ever questioned your brilliance this post removed all doubt. You had me in stiches with your dentist story (sorry that your pain makes me laugh, Darth Vader-LOL), my brain was almost overwhelmed with your Origins of the World speech (you had me scared for 2 seconds with the “I believe in evolution.” quote. phew!), and in regards to your wondering over my deleted post, don’t worry. I had a bad night at church, got my feelings hurt by my two pastors and took it out on my poor blog. Upon reading it this morning, my rant only further validated the whole “red-head with a temper to match” picture of myself, and I realized that it was a completely worthless piece of “poor me” drivel written by an emotional female. Thus the deletion. It wasn’t worth the time I took to peck it out while crying, nor anyone’s time reading or commenting on it, soooo….enough with that.
Ok, I think the other debate is dead, so I’ll try to tackle the current one at hand : Co-Ed B-studies.
This one caught me off guad because I can honestly say I’ve never thought about it. I guess being raised and currently involved in the “charismatic” type church, it’s a pretty normal occurence. I would say that as a whole, the independent, charismatic body of believers take the “freedom” and “permissible” thing too far at times, so I imagine that is why it has been a non-issue for me. Currently my church has “small groups” that meet during the week and the single men and women have a co-ed study every other week, and a seperate study divided by gender every other week. We divide up to study and discuss issues that pertain to us. For instance, the guys are covering sexual purity and the girls are covering female relationships right now.
Ok so let’s talk pros and cons since I really don’t think I have a conviction about it yet, maybe I will after the discussion:
PROS:
1. Kim said, men and women have different perspectives and bring equally valid and fascinating viewpoints to the table in a Bible study, and I’ve seen this come into play through personal experience. We can learn something we probably never would have if everything were same-gender.
2. The interaction that happens at these Bible studies are great (usually) and give us an understanding of the opposite sex that we may not have otherwise. Comes back to the different perspectives. It’s a good time to grow and teach each other in how to relate to one another, respect each other etc. I’ve also seen this dynamic come into play.
3. As long as the topic or discussion is gender-nuetral as almost everyone has stated ( and sometimes that’s hard, so it falls to the responsibility of the leader in charge to facilitate proper discussion), it can be a very positive experience.
4. As a homeschooler, I experienced the whole segregationist behavior that the amish culture possesses. At times it was unintentional or encouraged, but it happened- the guys would hang out on one side of the room and the girls on the other (and never should the two meet). Because of it, I lacked the skills to relate to guys into my teen years, and it wasn’t until well into high school that I had any good guy friends. Now am I blaming that on the homeschooling association? No way! But I wish there had been more interaction encouraged, rather than discouraged. I hope that makes sense. Point being: beware of seperating the sexes just because it removes the “appearance of evil.” factor.
5. Kim in regard to your women leading co-ed. I did, just last semester. It wasn a little different though than the one you are referencing. This Bible study group studied guitar and the Bible, and it was multi-generational, multi-relational (singles and marrieds), and bi-gender. I loved it. I really enjoyed the diversity and it worked well.
CONS:
1. Discussion could lead to innapropriate topics that, like Pandora’s box, should not be opened. I remember one time, after the study, the guys and girls were hanging out in my bedroom and the discussion led toward “Do guys know when girls ‘like’ them?” Of course, our arrogant little boys stated that they “always” knew, and that put the girls in a state of terror. haha!
2. When there is a co-ed enviroment, people tend to close-up and not be as “real” as they should. Whether it be that someone is uncomfortable sharing a weakness or an opinion because guys/girls are present, or so and so likes so and so and wants to seem all spiritual and make the best impression. I’ve known myself to be reluctant to share because I was intimidated by what the guys would think. That is RARE though.
3. Same gender studies give those involved the option of talking about “taboo” topics or gender-specific topics they wouldn’t otherwise venture into.
4. Some people say that you promote romantic relationships by having this format, but I don’t really think that’s always a bad thing…we are single adults and looking for a mate is not a sin.
Alright, I think I exhausted all I could think of. I imagine y’all will come up with a few more biblical and logical points. I can’t wait for your thoughts Holly since you brought up this nifty discussion.
peace out – B r o o k e
aight i guess i’ll put down my thoughts now…the reason why i brought it up was because a friend and i were talking about how the whole “co-ed bible study thing” was causing some controversy within a Christian organization on the college campus she attends. basically, some of the kids had it on their hearts to start up a co-ed bible study, but the leadership shot it down because they were concerned that people would attend the co-ed studies “for the wrong reasons.”
i guess i can see their point, but i personally disagree. some of the best studies i have attended were co-ed. men and women think about things a little differently, as many of you pointed out, and i think that adds a lot to the conversation. also, as “spokenfor” mentioned, i don’t think that going to a co-ed study for, “the wrong reasons” [that is, to scope out the opposite sex
] is necessarily a bad thing. i’ve heard a lot of stories of people who came to know the Lord because they went to church to meet girls, or followed a certain hot guy to a campus crusade large group, or because a cute girl invited them to an intervarsity bible study. and, on the flip side, i’ve heard a lot of beautiful stories of Christians who hooked up and eventually got married cuz they met at a bible study. that can’t be all bad, now can it? i guess it would be bad if the whole “opposite sex” thing became a distraction to a person in the study…but really then, isn’t that the person’s problem and not the study’s? i hate to sound harsh, but does the church separate into “men’s and women’s services” for fear that the congregation would be distracted from the message because they were checking out the opposite sex? honestly, if the study attendees will all be adults about being in a mixed environment and make sure they’re putting God FIRST, it should be ok.
there are always exceptions, of course. i would definately split up if the study will be discussing initmate issues that would be difficult in a co-ed group [like sexual purity and such]. and some people are just more comfortable in a same-sex environment…if that’s the case, by all means, attend an all-women or all-men study. also, if this is more than just a “bible study” but also an “accountability group” where the members will be sharing personal struggles with each other, that definately should NOT be co-ed. [although i have shared some pretty personal stuff in the presence of guys...however, these were guys i trusted like brothers, and not just fellow bible study attendees i only saw once a week or so.]
to sum up, i am for the most part in favor of co-ed studies when they are appropriate. and i’m having a hard time understanding why this campus ministry is so against them.
thanks for your input, kids!
p.s. chris–that c.s. lewis quote was from the 4 loves.
Hi Chris! I saw you posted a comment on my site, so I just wanted to make a quick statement. I don’t really want to get deep into things here (especially since you’re friends with Mike Jessen), but I have no problems with the Christian religion. I actually find the belief system itself to be a beautiful one. What I have a problem with are the people. I’ve encountered so many hyprocrytical, self-righteous, close-minded “Christians.” I know that not all Christians are like that, but my experiences have been very negative, hence my rant the other day. Religion can be debated endlessly. I have no problem with people believing whatever they want to believe, so long as they don’t force it on me. I certainly would never push Wicca on anyone, I’ll gladly answer questions, but religion/beliefs are individual. It’s up to you to be comfortable with your belief system. Well, I think that took up enough time & space. I wish you well in all that you do (especially that next dentist visit
). Take care.
Hmmm… I have not the time nor the energy to respond to the query, so I will instead compliment you on your hilarious post and recent debate questions. Uh…my compliments.
your encounter with the crazy dentist man reminds me of the psychopathic crazy doctor that Bruce Campbell plays in Escape from L.A. just some random usless comment.
until all good things…
Hey,thanx for the comment!!! i was reading your site and i rather get a shot then go to the dentist.because i hate the dentist,the stoff they put in you mouth is nasty.P.S: Sailor moon stoff is the best!!!
***LaDiE SpIcE***
they’re gonna fix the cavity and then they’re gonna tell you to come back in to have your wisdom teeth removed. they just want your money. And i always get a new toothbrush when i go. Maybe it was a new thing they started.
i’ve gotten toothbrushes from my dentist as long as i can remember…must be a marketing ploy…”we’re gonna suck your bank account dry with this wisdom tooth surgery, but hey, you get a FREE TOOTHBRUSH at every checkup! what a deal!”
I really kinda agree with most of holly and brooke’s points. I myself am the leader (well, really facilitator) of a co-ed small group at my local InterVarsity. So I see nothing wrong with co-ed Bible Study in most situations. I mean, obviously, if you’re going to go deep into discussions on sexuality or on private sins, that’s something that should be divided by gender. Guys aren’t going to open up about lust issues in front of girls–it just doesn’t happen in my experience.
If the Bible study is a one-on-one thing, like mentoring, then that should also be guy-with-guy and girl-with-girl. First of all because an older, more spiritually mature guy will better understand another guy who’s young in the faith than an older, more spiritually mature woman. And second of all, to “avoid even the appearance of evil.” I mean, sure, maybe nothing but Bible study is going on in a co-ed mentoring relationship–but that won’t stop the gossipmongers from gossipmongering.
Should a co-ed Bible Study be led by a woman? (Can of worms, Kim, can of worms!) Well, personally, I have no problem being taught by a woman. I have learned many things from women about my spiritual life, my faith, chivalry, kindness, compassion, maturity and wisdom. Two of them were my last girlfriend and my mother.
Titus 2 has a lot about the older women teaching the younger women. But it seems to be describing more of a mentoring relationship–not a Bible study type of thing.
The biggest blow to my view, however, is 1 Timothy 2:12-13. “I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she must be silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve.”
The first thing I would consider here is, does a Bible study leader really have any authority over a guy in her group? Not really. The leader of a Bible study is more facilitator than leader–they steer the conversation, point out things about passages of scripture. But it’s not like the role of pastor or elder, where she would be responsible for his spiritual well-being.
It still says, however, ‘I do not permit a woman to teach…a man.’ And to be totally honest, I don’t know what to do with that. How can I reconcile my personal feeling on the matter with what I’m reading in front of me? Perhaps it means “teach within the church,” as in more of a preaching role. Perhaps this is something that was Paul’s preference and not God-breathed. But in the end I don’t know. I have to do more research before I can bring you anything definite.
I still feel what I feel. And if next year there’s a small group and Kim (Lampron) or Teena is head of it, I really don’t think I’d have major problems with joining it. Call it my own personal stubbornness, and my innate reluctance to give up something I believe in once I’ve decided it. But I’m not going to start screaming that no woman should be permitted to teach me if I personally don’t see the sense in it.
Lady pastors is a deeper issue. And perhaps an issue that should be reserved for our NEXT discussion. *grin*
Agree? Disagree? Continue discussion!
OOOCH ! Yeah Chris, that one messes with me…but we have to be very careful to keep it in context – Paul was talking to a church where the women were getting loud during church and there was authority issues, at least from my studies that has been the case. If we get into the legalism of defining womens role in ministry by one scripture and not the whole of the Bible (I can and will name many strong women of the bible who were in “leadership/teaching” roles of some sort, if requested), then we are in danger of missing out on a wonderful gift that women can offer. When it comes to issues such as this where the Bible seems to be contradictive, we must take a scripture and apply it to the whole thought and intent of the the Bible concerning that specific topic. I don’t know about you, but I actually think women are allowed to talk in church, wear makeup, pierce their ears, not wear a viel and so forth, and it NOT be a sin. And the bible seems to have some “proof texts” on those issues, but only the weirdo-cultish people seem to quote those scriptures(heehee!).
Not that I think you are trying to say we should restrict woman,Chris (never would I say that!!) I just have a problem when people quote that verse and forget certain others. Secondly, I have dealt with the discrimination that come when guys take this scripture to extremes. I was in a leadership role for student ministry at my bible college. I did not seek the role. But there were no men willing or able to step up to the plate, so I took it. And that experience was one of the most amazing in my life – I actually “taught” in a pulpit at the Salvation Army Chapel several times and so did many of the other women in that student ministry, as well as the few guys. But the other men that were in leadership in that same student ministry dept. (evangelism – go figure) ignored me, made me feel like I was less of a leader and never even acknowledge the role I had taken or the job I did.
If there was a man available, I would have never taken that role, and that’s my point. A lot of times men of God won’t step into their calling, so women have to pick up the ball that was dropped. Do I condone women as pastors of a body of believers? by no means! But I do believe that for example,when I taught the teens 2 weeks ago at youth service (and I asked the youth pastor if I could), that was completely appropriate and needed. Diversity is a cool thing.
I also realize women try to fill roles men were desgined for and when a man comes along, they won’t step aside. We are stubborn like that at times
The whole point of my comment was to be cautious that you don’t create a cookie cutter mold to fit men and women into when it comes to the ministry ok?
And if I didn’t make sense, or it seemed like I was attacking men (or Chris), please forgive me because that was not my intention. I just wanted to play devil’s advocate
(and you thought that was your job, Chris) and speak from personal experience.
Oh yeah and I’m not feeling to well, so that may explain my lack of coherence…
Taught by women?!?!?! Preposturous (sp?). J/k. Hehe, You said Big BanD theory. I think it was Buddy Rich who formed the first Big band, after which it exploded into Chick Corea, and Maybe even sometimes the Flecktones (not totally sure), but Buddy Rich is all about the Big Band.
I was wondering when someone would notice that typo. I was going to edit it, but then I decided to leave it just for the heck of it. *grin* You being the journalism major and all–of course you’re the one who caught it.