Wednesday, 06 January 2010

  • Twilight Dare: Chapters 9-14

    Continuing my review of Twilight...

    Traditionally, there are three elements to a good story: Plot, Character, and Setting.  These elements have blurred in recent years' analysis: the first two are very much intertwined, while the last may not be as crucial to certain types of story.  Nevertheless, they do serve as a handy rubric for narrowing down where Stephenie Meyer's strengths and weaknesses as a storyteller are.

    Setting: This is Meyer's strongest point.  She actually has very strong prose when describing scenery.  Her description of Charlie's house is vivid and strong; her setting in the beach trip scene is incredible.  For example, here's a tidal pool that Bella's looking into...

    "The bouquets of brilliant anemones undulated ceaselessly in the invisible current, twisted shells scurried about the edges, obscuring the crabs within them, starfish stuck motionless to the rocks and each other, while one small black eel with white racing stripes wove through the bright green weeds, waiting for the sea to return."

    It could use a few semicolons, sure, but it's clear, it's vivid, I can picture it in my mind.

    Plot:  This is shaky with Meyer, and I'll tell you why.  It really isn't fair for me to comment on this book's plot arc before I've finished the book, but there are several things I've noticed are missing.  I know (due to movie previews and the book's prologue) that at some point a tracker vampire will go after Bella, and Edward will have to fight him.  We've seen neither hide nor hair of that fella yet.  I know that the other Cullen "children" will become characters in their own rights, with speaking parts and all, instead of just being described from across the cafeteria.  We haven't met them yet.  And we're past the halfway point of this book.

    When people will become plot-crucial, you want to work them in as soon as possible.  I'm worried we're going to end up with James being some kind of villain-ex-machina, popping up out of nowhere in the third-to-last chapter.

    This only makes literary sense if we see the book's entire plot so tightly focused on Edward and Bella's relationship that our only arc is found therein, and that all other characters/villains/events are only there to serve that end.  In other words, that the author started with the relationship and then said, "What can I throw at these two that will show how awesome Edward is?"  Hence, the random small-town rapists, a suddenly-popping-out-of-nowhere vampiric antagonist, etc.

    To be sure, many authors have a favorite book element that they design the plot around.  It just shouldn't be this transparent.

    Character:  This is Steph Meyer's Kryptonite.  She's working hard at creating two vivid characters in our minds, and to a certain extent she is succeeding at that.  Give me a situation, I can probably intuit what Bella or Edward will do in that situation.  (If it's Bella, the answer's probably: "trip and fall and wait for Edward to save her, then berate Edward sarcastically.")

    My complaints about her Character amount to:
    --Her characterization is often inconsistent.  (See my first post, about Bella's sudden unlikely switch from angsty to grateful and back, for an example.)
    --Her two main characters, while vivid, are in several ways unlikeable.  (Edward's possessiveness, extreme moodiness, and possible-domestic-abuse--once again at the end of 13, he physically overrides her will when she wants to drive her own car home.  Also, he prefers the music of the '80s to the '60s.) (Bella's insistence on being constantly miserable, her occasional bouts of manipulation, and, to quote another reviewer of Twilight, "I suppose what bothers me so much is that, right off the bat, Bella's entire relationship is borderline-dependent: she needs him to feel better about herself. She needs him to feel secure. She needs him to protect her from her inherent physical inferiority. When is Stephenie Meyer just going to stick Bella in the kitchen where she belongs, barefoot and pumping out vampire babies for Edward?")
    --That apart from Charlie, almost no human characters are developed at all.  (Seriously: they haven't talked yet, but Rosalie and Alice Cullen are better-developed than Jessica and Angela at this point.  Eric is only characterized (disparagingly) by his "dog-like" qualities, Mike by his jealousy, Lauren by her cattiness.  Each has only one dimension.)



    I'm talking about these things--the book in general--because for the last few chapters practically nothing has happened.  We've spent an entire chapter in the cafeteria teasing out of Edward little tiny details about how life as a high school vampire works, how he likes to eat mountain lions while his brother prefers grizzlies; we've spent another chapter in the car teasing out of Edward little tiny details about how life as a high school vampire works; we've spent another chapter between classes teasing out of Edward little details about how life as a high school vampire works, and how his mind-reading makes him jealous because of what other boys think of Bella...  Also, every few sentence Bella fixates on another gorgeous part of his body, be it is hair or his eyes or his chest...  And every other page the word "dazzling" gets used.  It is boring as whathaveyou.

    Chapter 11 even covers a full 36 hours of Edward's and Bella's conversations.  I don't see how this could be interesting unless you're trying to live vicariously through one of them.  I have many conversations with my wife that would be interesting to no-one except to me and her--you would be bored to death listening in.  These are those kind of conversations: about Bella's favorite gemstone, about how she doesn't like moss on trees, about how brown is a nice warm color...


    I love this line here: I know it's not condoned per se, and it was just Nyquil used to help her get to sleep, but the funny thing was, when Twilight first came out and I flipped through a copy in the bookstore, this was the first line I read:

    "I woke early, having slept soundly and dreamlessly thanks to my gratuitious drug use."

    Heh.


    Oddly enough, it's in the same chapter that we get a drug metaphor for the reason why Bella (specifically) triggers Edward's bloodlust more than any of the other humans in the school  ("'So what you're saying is, I'm your brand of heroin?' I teased, trying to lighten the mood.  He smiled swiftly, seeming to appreciate my effort.  'Yes, you are exactly my brand of heroin.'")  And then, of course, the analogy of a non-human-eating vampire "falling off the wagon" when they accidentally kill a human.  (It reminds me of that X-files episode where the brain-eating monster is attending OA meetings to try to break his brain-eating habit.)

    This is, of course, another symptom of Bella's inexplicable specialness.  I suppose every Disney princess or romance-novel heroine (no pun intended) gets this to a certain extent, but...  She self-describes as klutzy, sallow, unattractive, and yet she is the sole object of desire for every male in the school, including her town's resident undead Adonis-in-marble.

    It just seems like so much wish-fulfillment.  I guess the psychological term (if someone in the real world thought that this was really happening to them for real) would be delusions of grandeur--that you are incredibly influential, attractive, etc.


    Personally, to me the whole thing feels more like a giant sexual metaphor than any kind of drug-use analogy. 


    Now we get to Chapter 14, where we discover that Edward has been watching Bella while she sleeps.  Let me make something quite clear.  I already knew that Edward watched Bella while she slept at some point in this book.  What I didn't know was that he was doing this without her permission, with her not knowing he was there.

    But once again, because Bella is so in love with him, even this is somehow okay.  ("'You spied on me?'  But somehow I couldn't infuse my voice with the proper outrage.  I was flattered.")  In fact, she's ticked at her father for checking in on her, when her boyfriend does it much worse.  ("'See you in the morning, Dad.' See you creeping into my room at midnight tonight to check on me.")



    I hope there's an explanation for Bella's unexplainable popularity, why Edward can't read her mind, and her super-bloodlust-triggering appeal for Edward.  Maybe she's, like, a dhampir or something?

    Unfortunately, I doubt it.  That's probably all the explanation I'm going to get.

    Moving along...

Comments (19)

  • SirNickDon

    There is a sort of semi-explanation, and it's not that she's a dhampir, but you won't get there for a looong time, which makes the explanation seem tacked on and after-the-fact.  I doubt Meyer had it in mind when she wrote Twilight.

  • Theater_Pixie

     "I'm worried we're going to end up with James being some kind of villain-ex-machina, popping up out of nowhere in the third-to-last chapter."


    Yes. that is exactly what is going to happen. EXACTLY.


    Your review is spot-on. i read twilight five years ago, and i was the only person who had ever heard of it in my entire class then. my best friend had given it to me because she knew i liked vampires. (yes. i liked Lestat) i read it in a few days and fell in love with Cullen. Alice Cullen, that is. (she, i think, is the only developed charecter in the entire series, and she has a very small part, and from what i read, she's mainly used as a comic relief and cheery foil to Bella's angstyness. if the series focused on HER i think we would have had something here.)


    But aside from that, the entire plot was forgettable. Literally. I forgot it. I still don't really remember it. I remember sparkly  vampires, baseball, and a villian who shows up in the last fifty pages. There's a lot of ex-machina stuff, as if Stephanie Meyer was just making it up as she went along. It reminds me of the ghost stories i used to improvise when i was a kid; i wouldn't know how to end it, so i'd just throw stuff in until a conclusion just sort of....materialized.

  • Roadkill_Spatula

    From what I've heard, your insights sound right on.

  • shards_of_beauty

    I totally agree with your analases... that paragraph about the tide pools was actually the one thing that convinced me to keep reading... well to want to keep reading - the friend who gave me the book always asks if I finished the books she gives so I would have labored through these chapters anyway.  The plot arc makes more sense viewing the entire series as one plot, in which case you're still in exposition, which is why you haven't really met any other characters yet.  Doesn't make book 1 any less lame, but it's how I justify to myself that I like the series as a whole.  Also, in the half-finished Midnight Sun (Twilight from Edward's perspective) Meyer more or less addresses all these problems and tries to solve them without changing the story - like as she grew as a writer and realized her own first book had some serious issues.

  • Pass_the_Aura
  • sonnetjoy

    @Pass_the_Aura - We daren't click the link! 

  • Pass_the_Aura

    @sonnetjoy - Mostly harmless. This time there's no bloodletting... yet.

  • TheGreatBout

    The only thing Edward doesn't seem to do is use ruffies.

  • Such_Were_You

    Your posts are better than the book.  I never finished the book, but I finish all your posts about it.  

  • scrambledmegsntoast

    I am not going to comment on these, but I am reading them. I don't want to blurt anything out and your analysis is very good.

  • mr_faust

    you're a trooper for doing this


    also, i'd probably be bombed after a some # of shots since the only way i'd read this is through an alcohol-based game

  • ShadesChild

    Somehow my intrigue into possibly reading this book is being rapidly beaten into sober submission. For now I feel I shall stick to the Black Magician Trilogy.

  • OutOfTheAshes

    @scrambledmegsntoast - Oh good--I was starting to worry that this review series would make you hate me forever.    I just finished last night, so my last review will be up in a bit.

  • aegie

    dhampir ... haha. vampire academy?

  • aurieth_mynonys

    To get the explanation for why Edward can't read Bella's mind, I think you have to get to the fourth book. And I think I can say without being wrong that the fourth book is possibly the worst book ever written.


    The popularity? Never explained.

  • OutOfTheAshes

    @aurieth_mynonys - I've heard what happens in the fourth book, and I'm really not sure I could stomach reading about a dental caesarian.

  • OutOfTheAshes

    @aegie - Balkan mythology, actually.  Apparently their brand of vampire shares traits with the incubus.

  • anaraug

    "Also, he prefers the music of the '80s to the '60s."

    Dealbreaker!  No way.

  • Jill_Pole

    Did you know he totally oiled the window so it would go up and down noiselessly? And he was sitting in the corner in her rocking chair all night...YAAAAAAUGGHH.


    These details, while I'm not 100% sure if they're in Twilight, were actually in the part of Midnight Sun (Twilight from Edward's perspective) that got leaked. Seriously creepifying.

  • Sign in to Comment

  • Give eProps (?)

Who recommended?