Friday, 06 March 2009
-
A Response to "Shaving A Beard Is Unacceptable"
I should preface this by saying that I mean no disrespect to Kristenmomof3. The last thing I want is for this post to be seen as a personal attack or anything like that.
However, recently Revelife featured her entry, "The Bible: Shaving A Beard Is Unacceptable" in which she put forward the Leviticus 19:27 stance that men should not even shave the corners of their beards. And earlier, Revelife had featured her post, "Why Don't Most Christians Follow The Old Testament Dietary Laws?". I see there is also an entry by her on on the Kippah that's up for voting to get to the Revelife front page.
Since my answer to all three issues is identical, and since I have an almost neurotic aversion to repeating myself, I thought I'd make a response post instead of commenting the same comment over and over.
...
It certainly is a valid question. Why don't modern Christians follow half the stuff that's in the Old Testament? Why don't we eat kosher, wear prayer shawls, fully keep the Sabbath, and avoid shaving? You hear nonChristians bring this up all the time, especially when discussing LGBT issues--they say, "If you're going to use Old Testament verses to say that homosexuality is wrong, why don't you avoid linen/wool blended clothing? You have to do both, or you're just cherry-picking from the Bible."
Christians have some standard responses. Things like "Jesus fulfilled the Law, so we don't have to follow it anymore." (A weak response at best--Jesus himself said, in the same passage that he said he fulfilled the Law, "I tell you the truth, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.") But the standard responses seem unsatisfying, and often the question-askers are unconvinced.
Here's the trick: it's not a new question.
See, at first, all the Christians were Jewish. Jesus was Jewish, all the apostles were Jewish, and all the people who were getting converted were all Jewish. But then the gospel started to go out to the Gentiles, starting with Peter's conversion of the Roman soldier Cornelius. Now, the Church was in a pickle. Up till now, all the Christians had followed the Old Testament laws. Of course they did! They were Jewish! But once you start having non-Jewish Christians, do they have to follow the Old Testament laws too?
Some said yes (Acts 15:1, 5). They basically said, "When you become a Christian, you have to become Jewish, too. You have to get circumcised and eat kosher and do everything else that's in the Law of Moses."
Paul, the "Apostle to the Gentiles," disagreed vehemently (Acts 15:2). So he put together a delegation to Jerusalem, where many of the apostles still were, and they all held a Council to decide how they should go about this.
Some in the Council were in favor of making Gentile Christians follow Moses' Law. But Peter said, "...Why are you now challenging God by burdening the Gentile believers with a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors were able to bear?" (Acts 15:10)
Then James stood up.
"Brothers," he said, "listen to me. Peter has told you about the time God first visited the Gentiles to take from them a people for himself. And this conversion of Gentiles is exactly what the prophets predicted...
"And so my judgment is that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. Instead, we should write and tell them to abstain from eating food offered to idols, from sexual immorality, from eating the meat of strangled animals, and from consuming blood. For these laws of Moses have been preached in Jewish synagogues in every city on every Sabbath for many generations."
And this is what the Council decided. Their letter to the churches basically echoes James' words, saying that "it seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us to lay no greater burden on you than these few requirements," the three requirements that James listed.
Delegates were sent out and letters were written (Acts 15:22-31), reporting this decision to the Gentile churches, who were so encouraged by this that they "rejoiced."So when the question gets asked, "Why Do Christians Not Eat Kosher?" or "Why Do Christians Wear Wool/Linen Blends?" you have my answer. It's already been answered for me by the apostles. I am a Gentile, and out of all the Old Testament Laws only three apply to me. (Of course, there are all those New Testament commandments given by Jesus, Paul, John, James, Peter, etc. that DO apply to me.) This is why a Gentile Christian doesn't have to avoid linen/wool blends and can shave the corners of their beards and can eat lobster, but still can't be an active homosexual or sleep around or eat blutwurst.
I can learn principles from the other Old Testament laws. The linen/wool blended clothing is symbolic of compromise; not shaving the corners of my beard is an example of avoiding pagan practices; the veil in the tabernacle is a reminder of God's overwhelming holiness... But I am not bound to any of these laws.Now, if a Gentile desired to keep the other Laws as a token of their devotion or something like that, there's nothing wrong with that. But they cannot mandate or require such practice of others.
To recap: for a Christian who is not Jewish, only the following Old Testament laws apply: the sexual laws, the food-sacrificed-to-idols law, and the not eating strangled meat/blood law. The rest of the kosher rules, circumcision, prayer shawls, no-beard-shaving and the rest are not required of a Gentile Christian.
Post a Comment
- Back to OutOfTheAshes's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in OutOfTheAshes's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)


Comments (115)
Coming back to this to read more fully later.
On the other hand, I also know of Christians who keep kosher because they want to reach out to the Orthodox Jewish community. No problem with that, as far as I can see, as long as the lessons of Galatians are kept in mind. And then I know Messianic Jews who find it exhiliarating to be under grace rather than Law... It's a fascinating point.
I think you need to understand something, though... Kristen's not asking everyone to do that. All she is doing is studying (by the way... on the beard one they changed the title of her post, and edited it some... they do that, so that's not what she originally said in her title) and bringing forth discussion on these subjects. It's actually quite interesting to see her studies in Jewish culture.
Go to her site and see how Revelife changed things up. It makes a difference.
@Papillon_Mom -
*nod* Yeah, the title-change can throw some.Don't worry, though--I didn't think Kristenmomof3 was trying to mandate this for everyone. I was trying to generally answer the quite valid questions she brought up.
@Kontzicles -
Blutwurst. Heh.Thank you for discussing the issue and not the person as to many people tend to do and tend to attack people as a person instead of the topic.
G-d bless
Shalom
@Papillon_Mom -
That is very true too :) When I saw what Revelife changed the title to...I thought ...oy vey!@ChrisRusso -
@Kristenmomof3 - Yeah, personally if Revelife is going to post some of our posts, i wish they'd just leave them alone. LOL!
I found it to be a great discussion... and led to an even greater discussion.
@Kristenmomof3 -
@Papillon_Mom -
*nods* In this age where many people don't read all the way through a post before commenting, the title can be a crucial part of the post. Amazing how the whole tone of an article can be thrown off by the wrong title.
Be well!
I just had the chance to read this through. Interestingly, while I have often as a Christian been exhorted to be sexually pure, and in Japan had discussions about what constituted food-offered-to-idols, I have never been instructed by other Christians to not consume blood or the meat of strangled animals. Why do you think this has been cherry-picked?
justme
cm